The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Establish long-term recovery context and framework
|
|
Authority to plan is confirmed with reference to legislation, organisational direction, community and/or managerial agreement Completed |
Evidence:
|
Long-term recovery planning team is established with appropriate balance of expertise, entity representation and authority to plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recovery sub-committees are established correctly to assist with planning |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recovery structure is documented and authorisation arrangements for activation are implemented according to jurisdictional arrangements |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop agreed planning process and methodology
|
|
Processes for negotiating outcomes, key performance indicators (KPIs), information management, reporting, accountability and decision-making strategies are developed, agreed upon and documented accurately Completed |
Evidence:
|
Planning responsibilities and processes are agreed upon and documented fully |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholder communication and engagement strategies are developed and documented for the planning process, and for long-term recovery projects |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitoring and evaluation strategies are confirmed with the recovery teams |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Research and analyse long-term recovery planning issues
|
|
Context of impacted community, hazard data and hazard impact information about the disaster-affected community is obtained and validated to inform long- term recovery strategies and projects Completed |
Evidence:
|
Stakeholder engagement and communication is undertaken post-disaster impact to inform community-led recovery strategies and projects |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Risk assessment is undertaken to develop risk management processes for each long-term recovery project according to jurisdictional arrangements |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
The need of sub-committees to be established is facilitated |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop and document long-term recovery plan
|
|
Rationale for each agreed recovery program and project is documented in long-term recovery plan Completed |
Evidence:
|
Recovery planning incorporates delivery of lasting resilience outcomes as part of recovery activities |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Acquisition and application of organisational, human and equipment resources required for long-term recovery programs and projects are identified and documented in long-term recovery plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Financial and contractual arrangements for accessing or acquiring long-term resources and services are developed and documented |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Eligibility of long-term recovery projects and programs are checked against disaster funding arrangements |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Clear and concise language, appropriate for entities and target audience, is used in documentation |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Long-term draft recovery plan is distributed for review and comment to relevant stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Long-term recovery plan is submitted for authorisation and funding approval to implement the plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Review long-term recovery plan
|
|
Effectiveness of long-term recovery plan in meeting disaster-impacted community long-term recovery needs is reviewed on a regular basis Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identified unforeseen barriers that may impact on implementation of long-term recovery plan are referred to lead recovery entity |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Adjustments to long-term recovery plan are analysed and revised, where necessary, to ensure they still meet recovery funding arrangements, and relevant legislative or jurisdictional requirements |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Adjustments to long-term recovery plan are documented and communicated to relevant stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Plan for transition from recovery
|
|
Mainstream service delivery to meet ongoing community recovery needs is analysed and confirmed as no longer required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Ongoing recovery services are planned, transitioned and incorporated into ongoing planning, preparedness and resilience activities |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Documentation relating to providing long-term recovery support is completed and recorded in accordance with organisational procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Acknowledgements are made to all stakeholders involved in long-term recovery planning and implementation |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Monitor and evaluate long-term recovery outcomes
|
|
Methodology for evaluation and monitoring is developed that targets the assessment of the agreed outcomes, drawing on the established targets and indicators, including establishment of baseline measures. Completed |
Evidence:
|
Regular monitoring and evaluation are conducted to inform any adjustment to ongoing recovery programs based on changing needs, priorities, and outcomes |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
End of program evaluation is conducted based on approved methodology and plans |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Key lessons are identified and communicated to key stakeholders to embed in design of future actions |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|